Thursday, 17 June 2010

The Logic Book, M. Bergmann, J. Moor, J. Nelson, McGraw Hill, 2004, Ex. 10E, 5(f), p. 563

The following set of sentences is inconsistent. Show that it is so. Strategy: we show that the original assumptions lead to a contradiction on line 16.
  1. (x)[(Sx • Bxx) ⊃ Kax] / Assumption
  2. (x)(Hx ⊃Bxx) / Assumption
  3. (∃x)(Sx • Hx) / Assumption
  4. (x) ¬ (Kax • Hx) / Assumption
  5. Sm • Hm / 3EI x/m
  6. Hm / 5Simp.
  7. Hm ⊃Bmm / 2UI x/m
  8. Bmm / 6,7MP
  9. Sm / 5Simp.
  10. Sm • Bmm / 8,9Conj.
  11. (Sm • Bmm) ⊃ Kam / 1UI x/m
  12. Kam / 10,11MP
  13. ¬ (Kam • Hm) / 4UI x/m
  14. ¬ Kam ∨ ¬ Hm / 13DeM
  15. ¬ Hm / 12,14DS
  16. Hm • ¬ Hm / 6,15Conj.

No comments:

Post a Comment