Saturday 14 November 2009

Deduction, D.Bonevac, Blackwell, 2nd edition, 2003; 8.3 problem 11

The task is to show that the given sequence (line 2) is a consequence of a formula. The formula is a translation of the English sentence: There is one and only one God. The conclusion (the given sequence) reads: Something that is a God has property 'F' if and only if anything that is a God has property 'F'. Perhaps the most valuable hints here are that: a) the universal quantifier on line 6 can be instantiated again, to a constant (here 'a') on line 11, and b) that the universal quantifier can be instantiated to the same constant (here 'a' on line 24 and 25) as the existential quantifier. Then it is just a matter of assuming a = a, without any justification. There is no reason to worry about using the same constant again after line 22 because all previous assumptions have been discharged.
  1. (∃x)(y)(y = x ≡ Gy)
  2. ∴ (∃x)(Gx • Fx) ≡ (x)(Gx ⊃ Fx)
  3. * (∃x)(Gx • Fx) / ACP
  4. ** Gx / ACP
  5. ** Ga • Fa / 3EI x/a
  6. ** (y)(y = m ≡ Gy) / 1EI x/m
  7. ** x = m ≡ Gx / 6UI / y/x
  8. ** (x = m ⊃ Gx) • (Gx ⊃ x = m) / 7BE
  9. ** Gx ⊃ x = m / 8Simp
  10. ** x = m / 4,9MP
  11. ** a = m ≡ Ga / 6UI y/a
  12. ** (a = m ⊃ Ga) • (Ga ⊃ a = m) / 11BE
  13. ** Ga ⊃ a = m / 12Simp
  14. ** Ga / 5Simp
  15. ** a = m / 14,13MP
  16. ** m = a / 15Id
  17. ** x = a / 10,16Id
  18. ** Fa / 5Simp
  19. ** Fx / 17,18Id
  20. * Gx ⊃Fx / 4 - 19CP
  21. * (x)(Gx ⊃Fx) / 20UG
  22. (∃x)(Gx • Fx) ⊃(x)(Gx ⊃Fx) / 3 - 21CP
  23. * (x)(Gx ⊃Fx) / ACP
  24. * (y)(y = a ≡ Gy) / 1EI x/a
  25. * a = a ≡ Ga / 24UI y/a
  26. * (a = a ⊃Ga) • (Ga ⊃a = a) / 25BE
  27. * a = a ⊃Ga / 26Simp
  28. * a = a / Id
  29. * Ga / 27,28MP
  30. * Ga ⊃Fa / 23UI x/a
  31. * Fa / 29,30MP
  32. * Ga • Fa / 30,31Conj.
  33. * (∃x)(Gx • Fx) / 32EG
  34. (x)(Gx ⊃Fx) ⊃(∃x)(Gx • Fx) / 23 - 33CP
  35. [(∃x)(Gx • Fx) ⊃(x)(Gx ⊃Fx)] • [(x)(Gx ⊃Fx) ⊃(∃x)(Gx • Fx)] / 22,34Conj.
  36. (∃x)(Gx • Fx) ≡ (x)(Gx ⊃ Fx) / 35BE

No comments:

Post a Comment